Skip to main content

Review of regulation techniques of asphalt pavement high temperature for climate change adaptation

Abstract

Asphalt pavement is vulnerable to the temperature rising and extremely high-temperature weather caused by climate change. The regulation techniques of asphalt pavement high temperature have become a growing concern to adapt to climate change. This paper reviewed the state of the art on regulating asphalt pavement high temperature. Firstly, the influencing factors and potential regulation paths of asphalt pavement temperature were summarized. The regulation techniques were categorized into two categories. One is to regulate the heat transfer process, including enhancing reflection, increasing thermal resistance, and evaporation cooling. The other is to regulate through heat collection and transfer or conversion, including embedded heat exchange system, phase change asphalt pavement, and thermoelectric system. Then, the regulation techniques in the literature were reviewed one by one in terms of cooling effects and pavement performance. The issues that still need to be improved were also discussed. Finally, the regulation techniques were compared from the perspectives of theoretical cooling effects, construction convenience, and required maintenance. It can provide reference for understanding the development status of asphalt pavement high temperature regulation techniques and technique selection in practice.

Introduction

The rising global mean surface temperature (GMST) is a typical sign of climate change. The Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) shows a global temperature rise of 1.2°C in 2020 compared to pre-industrial levels and an increase in the frequency of extreme weather events [1]. Asphalt pavement is highly sensitive to the environment, especially the temperature conditions [2]. In the context of global warming, asphalt pavements are facing a severe challenge. Gudipudi et al. (2017) [3] assessed the impact of climate change on the pavement in the United States using the AASHTOWare Pavement ME DesignTM with the climate inputs of projected climate data at different representative concentration pathways (RCPs). It was shown that climate change would increase 2% - 9% for asphalt pavement fatigue cracking and 9% - 40% for rutting in the next 20 years. Stoner et al. (2019) [4] used the projected climate data with a higher representative concentration pathway, RCP8.5, of 24 locations around the United States in evaluating the potential impact of climate change on asphalt pavement by 2100. The pavement performance was also predicted by the AASHTOWare Pavement ME DesignTM. The permanent deformation was highlighted as the distress with the largest increase in the given climate change scenario. Many studies have also identified high temperature-induced permanent deformation as one of the main problems for asphalt pavements in future climate change situations [5,6,7].

Improving the high-temperature performance of asphalt mixtures is the main measure to cope with permanent deformation. The ability of asphalt mixtures to resist permanent deformation can be enhanced to a certain extent by using modified asphalt [8, 9], and anti-rutting additives [10, 11], or through optimizing mixture gradation [12]. The commonly used modified asphalt includes styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) modified asphalt, rubber asphalt, etc. [8, 13]. Various types of anti-rutting additives are also widely used [11]. The stone matrix asphalt (SMA) and open-graded friction course (OGFC) are chosen extensively because of their strong interlocking benefits rutting resistance [14]. However, the potential for further improvements in the high-temperature performance of asphalt mixtures is diminishing now. It will be increasingly difficult to cope with the effects of future climate change simply by improving the high-temperature performance of asphalt mixtures.

The problems of asphalt pavement in high-temperature conditions are mainly caused by the fact that the temperature of asphalt pavement under solar radiation is much higher than the environmental temperature. Many researchers have explored solutions to the high-temperature disease of asphalt pavement from a heat transfer perspective. It is feasible to reduce asphalt pavement temperature by certain regulation techniques, thereby alleviating the permanent deformation [15]. Regulating asphalt pavement high temperature has apparent advantages in adapting future climate change.

Regarding the high-temperature challenges of climate change on asphalt pavement, this paper reviewed the state of the practice in asphalt pavement high-temperature regulation. A comparative analysis was conducted in terms of regulation paths, cooling effects, and pavement performance. The issues that still need to be improved were also discussed. The framework of this paper is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Article framework

Influencing factors and regulation paths of pavement temperature

Asphalt pavements are built in a natural environment. Their temperature is a dynamic parameter, which varies with the external environment [16]. The influencing factors of asphalt pavement temperature can be categorized into environmental factors and material factors. The environmental factors include air temperature [3, 17], total solar radiation [18], atmospheric counter radiation [19], wind speed [20], humidity [2], latitude [21, 22], etc. The material factors mainly include the ability to absorb and reflect solar radiation of pavement material, the heat conduction, heat convection, and heat radiation properties of pavement [23]. Many researchers have depicted the schematic diagram of the photo-thermal environment of asphalt pavement [24,25,26]. In this paper, the schematic diagram is further optimized and shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The photo-thermal environment of asphalt pavement

Environmental factors

Among the environmental factors, air temperature has the most significant influence on asphalt pavement temperature. The asphalt pavement temperature changes with the similar trend as air temperature. Many asphalt pavement temperature models are mainly based on air temperature [27]. Asphalt pavement temperature is usually higher than the air temperature in the daytime, mainly due to solar radiation, which is the most critical environmental factor apart from air temperature. Solar radiation consists of two parts: 1) the direct radiation that the sun projects directly onto the pavement in the form of parallel rays, with wavelengths mainly concentrated between 0.3μm and 3.0μm; 2) the scattered radiation projected onto the pavement after scattering [28]. The ratio of the two parts is closely related to the weather. Direct radiation is dominant in clear weather, scattered radiation in cloudy weather [29]. Relative air humidity and wind speed also affect pavement temperature. Li et al. (2013) [30] monitored pavement temperatures where only the humidity differed. The temperature difference between wet and dry pavements ranged from 1.2 °C to 1.6 °C at surface and upped to 1.5°C to 3.4°C in the in-depth layers. Adwan et al. (2021) [25] found that the temperature difference between pavement surface and air can lead to a convection loss from the pavement to the air. The amount of lost energy is determined by wind velocity and the temperature difference between air and pavement surface. Each of these factors affects on the pavement temperature. But compared to air temperature and solar radiation, relative air humidity and wind speed have a minor effect on the pavement temperature. They are somewhat correlated with air temperature and solar radiation [31]. Therefore, air temperature and solar radiation are the major concerns in modeling asphalt pavement temperature field. Humidity, wind speed, and other factors are simplified [32]. Sun et al. (2006) [33] established a model of asphalt pavement temperature field with air temperature, solar radiation intensity, and pavement depth as the main input parameters, which can predict the temperature change in asphalt pavement with a good accuracy.

Material factors

Heat transfer pattern is generally categorized into heat conduction, heat convection, and heat radiation [26, 34]. Heat exchange between materials is a complex process, which usually involves various heat transfer patterns. And all the heat transfer patterns will be affected by the properties of materials [26, 34]. Qin [35] proposed a model to estimate the daily maximum temperature of asphalt pavement surface based on the heat transfer process (Eq (1)), in which multiple properties of asphalt pavement materials are included.

$${T}_{s\max }=\Gamma \frac{\left(1-R\right){I}_0}{\sqrt{kc\rho \omega}}+{T}_0$$
(1)

where Tsmax (°C) is the daily maximum temperature of asphalt pavement surface; Γ stands for the percentage of the absorption to the heat conduction; R is the albedo (or reflectivity) (Qin [35] treats albedo and reflectivity are interchangeable); I0 (W m-2) is the daily zenith solar irradiation; k (W m-1 K-1), c (J kg-1 K-1) and ρ (kg m-3) are the thermal conductivity, the specific heat, and density of the pavement, respectively; ω (s-1) is the angular frequency, ω=2π/(24×3600); T0 (°C) is a regressed constant.

Regulation paths of asphalt pavement temperature

Changes in each influencing factor will result in changes in the asphalt pavement temperature. So the asphalt pavement temperature can be regulated by adjusting any influencing factors. Some environmental factors such as air temperature and solar radiation in the photo-thermal environment of asphalt pavement can be adjusted by the shade of trees. However, this measure is challenged in high-grade roads due to their large width [36,37,38]. Adjusting the properties of pavement materials and changing the heat transfer process of pavement are good options for regulating asphalt pavement temperature. Researchers have tried thermal reflective asphalt pavement, thermal resistant asphalt pavement, and evaporative cooling pavement to regulate the high temperature of asphalt pavement. In addition, the heat in asphalt pavement can be harvested and transferred outside or converted into other energy forms by appropriate methods, thereby reducing the temperature. Solar collector asphalt pavement, phase change asphalt pavement, and thermoelectric asphalt pavement are solutions along this path [39].

Heat transfer process regulation

Reflection enhancement

The response of an object to thermal radiation can be divided into reflection, absorption, and transmission. For asphalt pavements, its transmittance is not easily adjusted, but its reflectivity is possible [40]. Heat-reflective coating was developed to enhance the reflectivity of asphalt pavement [41]. In 1945, Schwartz [42] introduced a reflection enhancement technique into buildings as a measure for saving energy. At late 1990's, the Japanese Nagashima Coating Company developed a pavement coating based on reflection enhancement technique. The application showed that the white coating could significantly improve pavement reflectivity and reduce the temperature [43]. Many researchers have conducted extensive research on the heat-reflective materials, coating performance, and cooling effects [44,45,46]. Heat-reflective pavements have been used in Japan, the United States and some other countries. It can be prepared by simply paving a heat reflective coating on the original pavement, as shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Conventional and heat-reflective pavements [47]

Heat-reflective materials

Heat-reflective materials for asphalt pavement coating are generally composed of base polymer, additives, and pigment. The reflectivity is closely related to the performance of the pigment and base polymer [39]. Xie et al. (2019) [48, 49] analyzed the effect of color on reflectance and found that the visible reflectance (wavelength: 0.40-0.72μm, Rvisi) is sensitive to color brightness but the near-infrared reflectance (wavelength: 0.72-2.50μm, Rnir), on which the thermal properties mainly depend, isn't. Table 1 lists the pigments reported and the reflectance of coated and uncoated asphalt pavements, in which the total solar reflectance (wavelength: 0.2-2.5μm) is noted as Rtotal. It can been seen from the table, TiO2 and Iron oxide yellow have a good reflection effect, which are widely used. The reflectance of the coatings prepared by TiO2 and Iron oxide yellow can reach 40.5%. Compared with the traditional asphalt pavement, the total solar reflectance of the coating increases significantly. The near-infrared reflectance improved even more.

Table 1 Reflectance of different pigments and asphalt mixtures [48, 49]

The base polymer is used to bond other materials together and attach them to asphalt pavement. Commonly used base polymers include acrylic resin, epoxy resin, polyamide resin, polyphthalamine resins, etc. [50,51,52,53,54]. Wang et al. (2013) [53] used infrared spectroscopy and other optical means to study the base polymer and found that the base polymer has negligible reflectivity and cooling function. It should focus on the pigment to improve the coating reflectivity. Yi et al. (2019) [55] investigated the effect of the ratio of pigment to base polymer on the cooling effect. It was found that the best cooling effect was achieved when the ratio of pigment to base polymer is 1:1. The optimal ratio may vary with different pigment and base polymer types, but the differences are minor [49,50,51,52].

There are also many kinds of additives are included in the coating materials, such as diluents, wetting dispersants, defoamers, flow agents. They are mainly used to improve the storage stability and construction workability of the coating materials. Moreover, some additives can enhance the performance and extend the life of the coating [50]. Researchers found that the adhesion promoter additives can significantly increase the adhesion strength of the coating, thereby improving the service life of the coating [55].

The cooling effect of heat-reflective coating

Table 2 lists the cooling effect of typical heat-reflective coating in the literature. The Rtotal of heat-reflective coatings is significantly higher than that of the ordinary asphalt pavements (about 4.49%, listed in Table 1) to various extents. The maximum temperature reduction of the pavement in summer can reach nearly 20°C. The cooling effect is related to the composition of the coating material, the coating thickness, and the surface cleanliness. It also can be seen from Table 2 that different pigments and base polymers will result in different cooling effects [45, 56]. Zheng et al. (2015) [56] found that the cooling effect increases linearly with the increase of coating thickness, but the pavement skid resistance will be compromised. Jiang et al. (2019) [57] found that the increasing cooling effect mainly comes from the increase of pigment in thicker coating. So, increasing the pigment percent in coating materials also can improve the cooling effect. Tang et al. (2012) [58] found that the cooling effect tends to decrease with the accumulation of dust and other pollutants on the coating surface. Hence, it is necessary to clean the coating surface regularly to retain the cooling effect.

Table 2 Cooling effects of different heat-reflective coatings

The surface function of heat-reflective coating

The heat-reflective coating is a thin functional layer coated on the asphalt pavement surface, which does not affect the structural performance of asphalt pavement but reduces the texture depth of pavement surface, thereby affecting the surface function. Qin et al. (2015) [35] indicated that reflecting too much visible light will cause glare and aesthetic problems. Therefore, in practice, the heat-reflective coating is primarily gray, black, or other colors rather than white [57, 62, 63]. Li et al. (2020) [18] developed a thermochromic coating to balance the cooling effect and the pavement color, which can turn light at high temperature and dark as temperature decreases. The skid resistance of asphalt pavement is usually compromised by heat-reflective coatings, which can be compensated by adding machine-made sands, glass microspheres, wear-resisting agents, and ceramic particles to the coating [50, 55, 64]. Anti-aging and durability are also challenges for heat-reflective coatings. Xie et al. (2020) [31] compared the decay of reflectivity of heat-reflective coatings in different colors with consideration of temperature, humidity, and ultraviolet light conditions. It was found that the reflectivity of white coating is more likely to decline than that of coatings in other colors. Chen et al. (2018) [52] found that heat-reflective coating can significantly improve the durability of asphalt pavement, but the durability of the coating can’t match that of asphalt pavement.

Increasing thermal resistance

Cooling mechanism and cooling effect test method

The thermal resistance of a material is proportional to its thickness and inversely proportional to its thermal conductivity, as shown in Eq (2). For asphalt pavement, the thermal resistance can be characterized by the thermal conductivity when the thickness is constant. The thermal resistance of asphalt pavement can be increased by using materials with low thermal conductivity or changing the mixture gradation to obtain a small thermal conductivity [65,66,67]. Chen et al. (2012) [68,69,70] proposed a model of concrete thermal conductivity based on the Campbell-Allen and Throne model and the Harmathy model, as shown in Eq (3). According to the model, the smaller aggregate thermal conductivity and the larger the void ratio, the smaller the concrete thermal conductivity.

$$\mathrm{R}=\frac{\delta }{\lambda }$$
(2)

where δ is the material thickness; λ is the thermal conductivity; R is material thermal resistance.

$$\lambda =\frac{K}{\frac{V_a}{K{\lambda}_a}+\frac{K-{V}_a}{K{\lambda}_m}}+\frac{1-K}{\frac{1-K-\Phi}{\left(1-K\right){\lambda}_m}+\frac{\Phi}{\left(1-K\right){\lambda}_{\Phi}}}$$
(3)

where λa, λm, λΦ are the thermal conductivity of aggregate, mortar, and voids, respectively; Va: is the volume fraction of mortar; Φ is the concrete void ratio.

Table 3 lists the commonly used four kinds of methods for assessing the temperature regulation effect of thermal resistant asphalt pavement. The simulation test (indoor or outdoor) is the most used method, which can directly show the cooling effect [71, 72]. The temperature field of asphalt pavement can be analyzed by the finite element method, which can support a cooling effect evaluation in more detail [73]. The cooling effect also can be assessed by the thermophysical properties of the pavement materials [66, 74]. In practice, all the four kinds of methods have their own limitations. Incorporating multiple methods is a better way to ensure the reliability of the assessment.

Table 3 Test method of cooling effect [66, 71,72,73,74]

The cooling effect through increasing thermal resistance

A usual approach to improve the thermal resistance of asphalt pavement is to replace the coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, or mineral powder in asphalt mixture by alternatives with low thermal conductivity. In addition, changing the air void content of asphalt mixture is a feasible way to improve the pavement thermal resistance value. Regardless of the way, the cooling effect depends on the thermophysical properties and amounts of the alternatives and the air void content of asphalt mixture. The cooling effect of the thermal resistant pavement in the literature is summarized in Fig. 4 [66, 73, 75], where the coarse aggregate is shale ceramic (CE), the fine aggregate is floating beads (FB), the mineral powder is fly ash cenosphere (FAC), and the temperature is measured at a depth of 4 cm or 5 cm inside the pavement. It can be seen from Fig. 4 that the cooling effect increases with the increase of the amounts of alternatives with low thermal conductivity and the increase of the air void content of asphalt mixture. However, the cooling effect is not so good when all the fine aggregate is replaced. Wang et al. (2018) [74] attributed this to the high porosity of the thermal resistance fine aggregate, too much of which will result in a loose structure due to the insufficient asphalt binder. As shown in Fig. 4, using coarse alternative aggregate can achieve the best cooling effect. Using fine alternative aggregate also can obtain some effect when the substitution rate is appropriate. Moreover, because it has less impact on asphalt pavement performance, the fine alternative aggregate has many applications. Che et al. (2018) [69] investigated the cooling effect of thermal resistant asphalt pavement with fine ceramsite. A 2.6 °C reduction and a 2.8 °C were observed in the indoor and outdoor tests respectively when the ceramsite substitution rate was 60%. The porous asphalt pavement can obtain a similar cooling effect with the thermal resistant pavement with fine alternative aggregate when the air void content reaches about 23%.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Cooling effect of different thermal resistant pavements

Thermal resistant coarse aggregate is the guarantee of high cooling effect. Wang et al. (2018) [75] investigated the cooling effect of asphalt pavement with shale ceramic coarse aggregate. It was shown that the pavement thermal conductivity gradually decreases with the increase of the amount of shale ceramic particles. The bottom of the pavement was cooled down by 6.6 °C in the test when the substitution rate reached 75%. Chen et al. (2017) [76] chose calcined bauxite coarse aggregate to prepare thermal resistant asphalt pavement. It was found from the indoor simulation test that the temperature of the upper and lower surface of the specimen decreased with the increase of the used amount of bauxite, the temperature difference between upper and lower surfaces became larger. When substitution rate reached 100%, the temperature at the specimen upper and lower surfaces was reduced by 10.30% and 18.51% respectively. It was indicated that calcined bauxite particles can reduce the absorption of heat radiation and hinder the heat diffusion in the pavement, thereby effectively reducing the internal temperature of asphalt pavement. Huang et al. (2020) [77] analyzed the cooling effect of asphalt pavement with ceramic waste as coarse aggregate using numerical simulation. It was shown that the maximum temperature inside the asphalt pavement gradually decreases with the increase of ceramic waste content, which was attributed to the decrease of the thermal conductivity brought by the ceramic waste aggregate. However, more heat will be accumulated at the pavement surface when the downward approach of heat transferring is resisted. An increase of the maximum temperature of pavement surface was observed from the pavement model with a 50% replacement of coarse aggregate by ceramic waste when the temperature at 4 cm depth decreased by 5.5 °C.

The performance of thermal resistant asphalt mixture

Aggregates with lower thermal conductivity tend to have poorer mechanical properties, which usually damage asphalt mixture performance [49, 78, 79]. Table 4 lists the basic properties of commonly used thermal resistant aggregates. Thermal resistant aggregates have relatively small apparent density, high water absorption, and high crushing and wear values. So the asphalt mixture performance and the thermal conductivity should be balanced in practice. Che et al. (2018) [71] investigated the high-temperature performance of thermal resistant asphalt mixture with fine ceramic aggregate by laboratory tests. The results showed that the dynamic stability of the mixture first increases with the increase of ceramic particle amount and then decreases with that. An about 60% replacement of fine aggregate by ceramic aggregate can result in the largest dynamic stability. It was mainly attributed to the balance between the advantages from lowed internal temperature and the disadvantages from the compromised mechanical properties by ceramic aggregate. Many researchers have studied the low-temperature performance of the thermal resistant asphalt mixtures using low-temperature bending test. Only slight reductions of low-temperature performance were observed in the thermal resistant asphalt mixture with ceramic, floating beads, or calcined bauxite aggregates [71, 75, 76].

Table 4 Basic properties of thermal resistant aggregate

Qian et al. (2020) [77, 87] found all the rutting resistance, moisture stability, and low-temperature performance were damaged when replacing coarse aggregate by ceramic particles by volume. The moisture stability is the most sensitive. The moisture stability will be unable to meet the requirements of related specifications of China when the replaced amount is higher than 40%. So the critical issue is how to reduce the pavement temperature with no or little compromise of asphalt mixture performance. Some researchers have explored the solutions by aggregate surface treatment. Wang et al. (2020) [85, 86] tried to modify shale ceramsite aggregates, porous volcanic rock aggregates, and refractory gravel aggregates using silicone resin and silicone–acrylic emulsion. The modified aggregates can bring significant improvements to asphalt mixture performance (as shown in Table 4). Andrzejuk et al. (2018) [88] tried to control the used amount of thermal resistant aggregate to ensure the asphalt mixture performance can meet the basic requirements. The thermal conductivity of the pavement also can be reduced by using porous asphalt mixture. However, too large air void content will also affect the pavement performance [73]. So it is needed to balance the thermal resistance and asphalt mixture performance.

Evaporative cooling

There are two kinds of asphalt pavement that can support evaporative cooling relatively well: permeable asphalt pavement and water retaining asphalt pavement [89, 90]. Wang et al. (2021) [91] compared the structures of traditional asphalt pavement and permeable asphalt pavement, and analyzed the cooling mechanism of them. The structure diagrams in reference [91] were optimized in this paper with combining the photo-thermal environment of the pavement, as shown in Fig. 5. Compared with conventional pavements, permeable pavements provide approaches for water to penetrate into the pavement, which make it possible to take the heat away from the interior of pavements through water evaporation. In addition, the porous nature of permeable pavement can reduce the thermal conductivity and heat diffusion rate, which is helpful to reduce the pavement temperature. However, the porous structure will also reduce the pavement reflectivity and weaken the cooling effect [73, 92]. Water retaining pavement can absorb water during raining or watering, and prolong the time with water [93,94,95]. In addition, water-retaining materials are generally in light color, which can improve the reflectivity of the pavement to a certain extent, thereby improving the cooling effect [92].

Fig. 5
figure 5

a Conventional pavement, b Permeable pavement [91]

The reported cooling effects of permeable pavements and water retaining pavements were summarized in Table 5. It can be seen that water evaporation can reduce the surface and internal temperature of asphalt pavement. The cooling effect is significant when water is sufficient. The short-time temperature reduction can be more than 10 °C, but the cooling effect will be weakened with the dissipation of water. Water retaining pavement can reduce the temperature by up to 10 °C, and has a relatively stable cooling effect compared to permeable pavement. Wang et al. (2018) [96] measured the water absorption rate of pavement using the partial immersion test, and analyzed the effect of water absorption capacity on cooling effect. It was shown that a high water absorption is beneficial to reduce the pavement temperature. The temperature reduction can reach 10 °C after watering. However, the cooling effect heavily depends on the water content of pavement. Buyung et al. (2017) [97] studied the temperature of permeable asphalt pavements with severe water shortage and found that the temperature of permeable pavements tends to be higher than that of conventional pavements during the dry season. So permeable pavements are not recommended in dry regions. Watering is the major measure to maintain the water content of pavement, which will also increase the consumption of water resources. Some researchers have analyzed the relationship between watering amount and cooling effect, which is helpful to achieve a balance between cooling effect and cost [98,99,100].

Table 5 Cooling effect of different permeable pavements and water retaining pavements

The permeable asphalt pavement has been widely used because it has multiple functions, such as noise mitigation [106] and safety enhancement in the rain [107]. It doesn't need any adjustment to the structure and materials of permeable pavement for evaporative cooling in practice, which will not damage the original pavement performance. For water retaining asphalt pavements, researchers mainly focused on the water-retaining materials and pavement performance [107]. Jiang et al. (2016) [90] obtained a water retaining asphalt pavement through grouting a water-retaining slurry, prepared using fly ash and calcium hydroxide, into porous asphalt pavement. The water-retaining slurry can bring not only the water-retaining capacity but also the improvements of pavement rutting resistance and moisture stability. Lee et al. (2009) [108] prepared a water-retaining slurry with a water absorption rate up to 70% using cellulose fiber and high absorption polymer. These typical studies show that water retaining pavement has cooling function without affecting the pavement performance, even can directly improve it.

Regulation based on heat harvesting, storage, and conversion

If the heat in asphalt pavement can be harvested and transferred outside or converted into other energy forms, the pavement temperature will be reduced. Along this technical route, researchers have developed heat exchange systems [109], phase change materials (PCMs) [110], and thermoelectric systems [111] for asphalt pavement to regulate its temperature. The heat exchange system regulates the pavement temperature through heat exchange between pavement and fluid flowing through the pipes embedded in pavement [109, 112]. The addition of PCMs can make asphalt pavement store the absorbed energy in latent heat at a specific temperature range to retain pavement temperature [113, 114]. The temperature difference between different layers of pavement can be used by a thermoelectric generator to convert heat into electrical energy, so that the pavement temperature can be reduced [115].

Heat exchange system

Heat exchange system in pavement was originally developed for using geothermal water to melt ice and snow in winter [116]. It also can use cold fluid to extract the heat in pavement. Wendel et al. (1979) [117] proposed a system to collect the solar energy by pavement and roof, and use the energy for pavement temperature regulation. In many countries, the heat exchange system has been used to regulate asphalt pavement temperature. In winter, the system is used to melt ice and snow by piping warm water in pavement. In summer, it is used to cool down pavement temperature by piping cool water in pavement, as shown in Fig. 6 [118, 119]. Researchers have carried out a lot of research on pipe materials, laying methods, and temperature regulation capacity [109, 120]. The Ooms Avenhorn Holding developed a Road Energy System, which showed good effects in cooling pavement in summer and melting ice and snow in winter in a test application in Netherlands [121]. An energy collection capacity of about 140MW·h per year and an energy output capacity of 30 - 100MW·h per year were observed in the test of an integrated system for melting snow and storing energy at A8 expressway in Switzerland [122]. The peak temperature of the pavement was reduced by 15 °C - 20 °C in summer. In 2009, a test road with a system coupling solar and geothermal energy for melting ice and snow was built in Daqing, Heilongjiang Province, China. It was observed that the pavement temperature retained above 0 °C when the air temperature reached -30 °C [119]. These reported applications showed that the heat exchange-based systems have good effects in melting ice and snow and reducing pavement temperature. However, these systems need to embed a pipe system in asphalt pavement, which is costly and challenging to maintain. So they were only applied in some airport pavement, and critical sections of high-grade urban roads and highways.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Diagram of heat exchange system

Energy storage

PCM asphalt pavement

PCMs can absorb or release a large amount of heat with retaining a specific temperature through changing its phase, which can significantly reduce the magnitude of temperature change [123, 124]. PCMs have relatively wide applications in construction, such as PCM trombe walls, PCM wallboards, PCM shutters, PCM building blocks, PCM pavement. PCMs are usually embedded by a distributed or layered structure [125]. Athukorallage et al. (2018) [126] studied the distributed and layered PCM asphalt pavement and found that for the layered has certain problems whether the PCM is embedded inside the pavement or at the surface. The PCM will be prone to vehicle wearing when at the surface and will change the heat distribution to a bad pattern when inside. In practice, PCM asphalt pavement mainly adopts the distributed structure. The PCMs can be added in asphalt pavement directly, or through packaged in a carrier or microcapsule.

The methods of PCMs incorporation

Adding directly is a straightforward method. Wei et al. (2019) [127] prepared a PCM modified asphalt by adding polyurethane solid-solid PCM into the asphalt. It was found that the specific heat capacity and thermal conductivity of the modified asphalt increased with the increase of the amount of PCM, but the thermal conductivity was always smaller than that of the base asphalt. Wei et al. (2019) [110] prepared a phase change asphalt mixture by using NiTi alloy phase change energy-storage particles (NiTi APCEP) as fine aggregate. The test results showed that The NiTi APCEP asphalt pavement with the substitution rate of 12 wt% has a 3.5 °C daily maximum temperature difference from the ordinary asphalt mixture specimen pavement. But, too much addition will damage the low-temperature crack resistance of asphalt mixture. Bian et al. (2012) [128] found that the addition of PCMs will compromise the cohesion and toughness of the asphalt.

It is more common to form phase change composite by introducing appropriate carrier materials to carry the PCMs. Solid-liquid PCMs and porous high absorption materials are usually selected for preparing phase change composite, in which the flow of PCMs can be confined due to the capillary and surface tension forces [113, 129]. Table 6 lists the typical carriers, PCMs, and the properties of the composites. Kuai et al. (2021) [130] prepared a modifier by using the polyethylene glycol-400 (PEG-4000) as the PCM and silica as the carrier, which was used in porous asphalt pavement. It was shown that the pavement temperature can be reduced by 3 °C and the mechanical properties and moisture stability of the mixture can meet the relevant requirements. Jin et al. (2019) [131] prepared fine aggregate and filler with binary fatty acids as a PCM and diatomite as a carrier and made asphalt mixtures with an addition of 3.5%. The test results showed that the maximum temperature at the upper and lower asphalt pavement surfaces decreased by 8.11 °C and 6.36 °C respectively. The low-temperature performance of pavement is almost unchanged, and the moisture stability decreased slightly. Jin et al. (2018) [132] prepared coarse aggregate using ceramsite as a carrier, poly (ethylene glycol) and ethylene glycol distearate (EGD) as PCMs. Then the particles were sealed by epoxy resin and used to mix asphalt mixture. The laboratory simulation tests showed that the asphalt pavement temperature can be reduced by 9.1°C through the usage of the prepared coarse aggregate.

Table 6 Basic properties of different PCMs

Encapsulating the PCMs into microcapsules can avoid the loss of PCMs in use. The structure stability, mechanical properties, and thermal conductivity of the microcapsule shell are the major concerns in development. Wei et al. (2017) [140] synthesized a microcapsule material with n-tetradecane and dimethylbenzene as phase change core materials and epoxy polymer as shell by interfacial polymerization, which showed good stability. Guo et al. (2019) [141] developed a microcapsule material with silicone rubber/paraffin@silicon dioxide compound, of which the mechanical properties were enhanced. Zhang et al. (2017) [142] prepared a microcapsule material using paraffin and melamine-formaldehyde resin as the phase change core and shell, respectively, with graphene oxide nanosheets embedded in the middle. Test results show the material has good stability, mechanical properties, and thermal conductivity.

PCM asphalt pavement has active temperature regulation function, of which the maximum and minimum temperature can be regulated by properly selecting PCMs. However, it still has some problems need to be improved and optimized by now. The high cost is also a factor limiting its wide application.

Energy conversion

Thermoelectric principle and cooling mechanism

Thermoelectric pavement can convert heat into electrical energy using the temperature difference between different layers of asphalt pavement or between road and the surrounding environment, thereby reducing the pavement temperature [111, 115]. The thermoelectric effect manifests itself as a voltage difference between the hot and cold sides of a semiconductor in response to a thermal gradient [115]. The voltage can be expressed by Eq (4). For a thermoelectric system, the current, power, and the total amount of heat can be obtained by Eq (5) through Eq (7) [143, 144].

$$V=\alpha \left({T}_h-{T}_c\right)$$
(4)
$$I=V/\left(R-{R}_l\right)$$
(5)
$$P={Q}_h-{Q}_c={I}^2{R}_l$$
(6)
$$Q=\alpha {IT}_c+K\left({T}_h-{T}_c\right)-1/2{I}^2{R}_L$$
(7)

where V is the voltage of the thermoelectric generator (TEG); Th is the hot side temperature of the

TEG; Tc is the cold side temperature of the TEG; α is the Seebeck coefficient of the TEG. I is the current; R is the internal resistance of TEG, RL is the load resistance; (Qh−Qc) is the heat flux due to temperature gradient; Q is the total amount of heat, and K is the heat transfer coefficient.

The methods for improving thermoelectric efficiency

An enough temperature difference is critical to the thermoelectric system. Thermoelectric pavement initially only relies on the natural temperature difference between different pavement layers or between the road and the surrounding environment to generate electricity. In order to increase the power generation efficiency and cooling effect, researchers have tried many improvement measures, such as increasing the temperature difference, enhancing the heat collection efficiency, and improving the thermal conductivity of the pavement. Jiang et al. (2018) [111] introduced vapor chambers and water tanks in the system, to improve heat collection and increase the temperature difference, respectively, so as to increase the voltage difference and achieve more efficient energy conversion. The introduction of water tank also can improve the cooling effect. The reduction of pavement temperature can reach about 9 °C. Hu et al. (2014) [145] proposed a thermoelectric system for asphalt pavement using aluminum plates as heat carriers, which improves heat collection efficiency and makes construction easier. Mallick et al. (2009) [146] constructed test pavement using aggregates with good thermal conductivity. It was found that suitable aggregates could improve the efficiency of thermoelectric conversion. Wu et al. (2005) [109, 147] suggested adding graphite and thermal conductive fibers to asphalt mixture, so as to enhance the pavement thermal conductivity. Although this approach can improve the power generation efficiency, the increased thermal conductivity will promote the pavement to absorb more heat from the environment, which is not unbeneficial to the regulation of asphalt pavement temperature. Hasebe et al. (2006) [148] employed the nearby river water as coolant to widen the temperature difference, thereby increasing the power generation of the thermoelectric system. It was found that both the power generation and the cooling effect can be improved when the cold end of the thermoelectric system has an enough low temperature.

Currently, the conversion efficiency of thermoelectric pavement is relatively low. The highest conversion efficiency found in this review is only 7.4% and the power generation of the systems is far from the theoretical value [149, 150]. Moreover, the thermoelectric system will increase the complexity of pavement structure, which brings some issues to be solved.

Comparison of different regulation techniques

Each regulation technique has its own advantages and disadvantages. The choice should be determined based on comparison of different regulation techniques with considering the environmental conditions. From the perspective of cooling effect, although many studies have quantified the cooling effect of different regulation techniques, there are still significant differences between the studies. In this paper, the theoretical cooling effects of different high-temperature regulation techniques were assessed according to Eq (1). In the assessment, the parameters of common asphalt pavement and the photo-thermal environment of a typical region in China were taken into account. Γ takes 0.8, R takes 0.15, I0 takes 810.99 W/m2, k takes 2.5 W/(m·K), c takes 797.23 j/kg·K, and ρ takes 2430 kg/m3. In the analysis, take one parameter as variable and fixed the others so that the trend of the maximum pavement surface temperature with the changing parameter can be investigated. The analysis results are depicted in Fig. 7.

Fig. 7
figure 7

a The cooling effect of reflection enhancement; b The cooling effect of increasing thermal resistance; c The cooling effect from energy angle; (d) The cooling effect from specific heat capacity angle

As shown in Fig. 7(a), the maximum pavement surface temperature will decrease by 3.46 °C when the reflectivity increases by 0.1. Theoretically, the pavement surface maximum temperature can be cooled by 23.15 °C when the reflectivity rises from 0.15 to 0.82. However, too high reflectivity will bring some safety problems. In practice, it isn't a good choice to excessively pursue reflectivity. It can be seen from Fig. 7(b), the smaller the thermal conductivity (the higher thermal resistance), the higher the maximum temperature of the pavement surface, which consistent with the conclusion of Du et al. [66] and Huang et al. [77] that the thermal resistant pavement can increase the surface temperature. The thermal resistant pavement can restrict the downward transfer of heat so that the temperature of the middle and bottom layers of asphalt pavement can be regulated, while the surface temperature will increase due to the accumulated heat. The benefits of thermal resistant pavement should be assessed based on the complete pavement temperature field. The cooling effects of pavement with heat exchange system and thermoelectric pavement can be assessed through the energy change. As shown in Fig. 7(c), the surface temperature will reduce by 3.62 °C with each reduction of 100W/m2 in energy.

The latent heat of materials is generally about a few hundred to a few thousand kJ/kg. For example, the latent heat of ice is 355 kJ/kg at one-atmospheric pressure, and the latent heat of water evaporation at 38°C is 2409.88 kj/kg. However, the specific heat capacity of water is 4.2 kJ/(kg·°C), which means the sensible heat of a temperature difference of 10 °C is only 42 kJ/kg. Permeable and water retaining pavements can be cooled through water evaporation. Theoretically, the cooling effect can be assessed using the heat taken away by water evaporation. The specific heat capacity of asphalt mixture is about 0.92 kJ/(kg·°C). For the asphalt pavement with a depth of 6 cm, the sensible heat per °C per m2 is about 116.24 kJ. The heat for evaporating 0.482 kg water is equivalent to the heat of changing the temperature by 10 °C for 1 m2 asphalt pavement with a depth of 6 cm. However, in practice, the heat for evaporating water is not only from asphalt pavement but also from environment, so it is difficult to precisely estimate the water consumption only by the latent heat of water evaporation.

The latent heat of PCMs used in asphalt pavement is usually in the range of 29 - 150 kj/kg. In this paper, an average of 89.5 kj/kg was taken for analysis. The calculation shows that the heat of changing the temperature by 10 °C for 1 m2 asphalt pavement with a depth of 6 cm is equivalent to the latent heat of 12.99 kg PCM. For PCM asphalt pavement, in addition to the latent heat, the change of pavement specific heat capacity should also be included in the cooling effect assessment. It can be seen from Fig. 7(d), the pavement surface maximum temperature decreases with the increase of pavement specific heat capacity. The increase of pavement specific heat capacity from 800 j/kg·K to 1600 j/kg·K can bring pavement surface maximum temperature a reduction of 8.59 °C.

In terms of construction convenience, permeable pavement, thermal resistant pavement and PCM asphalt pavement are the most convenient because they don’t require any additional construction work. The construction of heat-reflective coating and water retaining pavement is relatively convenient. Only a small amount of additional construction work is required. In contrast, embedding heat exchange system or thermoelectric system into asphalt pavement will be complex work. From the perspective of maintenance, the heat-reflective coating, thermal resistant asphalt pavements and PCM asphalt don’t require special maintenance. The permeable pavement and water retaining pavement only need to be watered regularly. However, both embedded heat exchange system and thermoelectric system require a large amount of additional maintenance work. According to the above comparative analysis, the advantages and disadvantages of various regulation techniques can be summarized as shown in Table 7.

Table 7 Advantages and disadvantages of different regulation techniques

Some researchers suggested incorporating multiple regulation techniques to achieve a better regulation effect. Li et al. (2013) [102] tried to make comprehensive use of reflection enhancement and evaporative cooling approaches. Karlessi et al. (2011) [151] introduced PCMs into heat-reflective coating. The laboratory test results showed that the PCM heat-reflective coating can obtain an extra temperature reduction of 8°C than the ordinary heat-reflective coating. The applications of comprehensive utilization of multiple regulation techniques are rarely reported by now, which needs further research.

Summary

The asphalt pavement high-temperature regulation techniques were reviewed. It has great potential to regulate the high temperature of asphalt pavement through taking specific technical measures. In the context of climate change, asphalt pavement faces severe challenges from high-temperature. Asphalt pavement high-temperature regulation will become an important technical measure to adapt to climate change. It is necessary to conduct systematic and in-depth research.

Although the evaluation of the cooling effect of various asphalt pavement high-temperature regulation techniques can be seen in the existing literature, it is still very difficult to compare the results between different studies. This mainly because there is no relevant standard for the test and evaluation of asphalt pavement temperature field. It is necessary to develop the test and evaluation standard of asphalt pavement temperature field to meet the needs of asphalt pavement permanent deformation analysis, so as to provide a unified test and evaluation means for related research.

Generally, the temperature field of asphalt pavement will be totally affected by the temperature regulation measures. However, most studies on the evaluation of cooling effect only focused on the change of temperature in one or some parts of the pavement structure. The comprehensive evaluation of asphalt pavement temperature field was rarely seen in the literature. It is necessary to comprehensively evaluate the effects of various high-temperature regulation techniques on the temperature field of asphalt pavement, so as to precisely assess the improvements of asphalt pavement high temperature performance brought by the regulation techniques.

Each asphalt pavement high-temperature regulation technique has its own advantages and disadvantages. Some have other functions. Some will compromise the pavement performance. How to balance high-temperature regulation and pavement function and performance is an important topic in this area in the future. In addition, comprehensive utilization of various regulation techniques showed certain advantages, which is also an important approach in this area.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

GMST:

Global mean surface temperature

AR6:

Sixth Assessment Report

IPCC:

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

RCPs:

Representative concentration pathways

SBS:

Styrene-butadiene-styrene

SMA:

Stone matrix asphalt

OGFC:

Open-graded friction course

Rvisi:

Visible reflectance

Rnir:

Near-infrared reflectance

Rtotal:

Total solar reflectance

CE:

Shale ceramic

FB:

Floating beads

FAC:

Fly ash cenosphere

PCMs:

Phase change materials

NiTi APCEP:

NiTi alloy phase change energy-storage particles

EGD:

Ethylene glycol distearate

PEG-4000:

Polyethylene glycol-400

SA:

Stearic acid

PA:

Palmitic acid

PEG:

Polyethylene glycol

References

  1. IPCC (2021) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. In Press

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yang X, You Z, Hiller J, Watkins D (2017) Sensitivity of flexible pavement design to Michigan's climatic inputs using pavement ME design. Int J Pavement Eng 18(7):622–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2015.1105373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gudipudi PP, Underwood BS, Zalghout A (2017) Impact of climate change on pavement structural performance in the United States. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 57:172–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.09.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stoner AMK, Daniel JS, Jacobs JM, Hayhoe K, Scott-Fleming I (2019) Quantifying the impact of climate change on flexible pavement performance and lifetime in the United States. Transp Res Rec 2673(1):110–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118821877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mahpour A, El-Diraby T (2021) Incorporating climate change in pavement maintenance policies: application to temperature rise in the Isfahan county. Iran Sustainable Cities and Society 71:102960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Knott JF, Sias JE, Dave EV, Jacobs JM (2019) Seasonal and long-term changes to pavement life caused by rising temperatures from climate change. Transport Res Record: J Transport Res Board 2673(6):267–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119844249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeong H, Kim H, Kim K, Kim H (2017) Prediction of flexible pavement deterioration in relation to climate change using fuzzy logic. J Infrastruct Syst 23(4):4017008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Domingos MDI, Faxina AL, Bernucci LLB (2017) Characterization of the rutting potential of modified asphalt binders and its correlation with the mixture’s rut resistance. Constr Build Mater 144:207–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarroukh M, Lahlou K, Farah M (2021) Effect of the bitumen type on the temperature resistance of hot mix asphalt. Materials Today: Proceedings 45:7428–7431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu C, Mai Y, Cannone Falchetto A, Tartari E (2021) Experimental investigation on the use of selenice natural bitumen as an additive for pavement materials. Materials 14(4):1023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14041023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xiao F, Wang J, Yuan J, Liu Z, Ma D (2020) Fatigue and rutting performance of airfield SBS-modified binders containing high modulus and antirutting additives. J Mater Civ Eng 32(3):4019366. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang W, Sha A, Xiao J, Wang Z (2012) Gradation optimization of porous asphalt mixtures based on rutting resistance. J South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition) 40(11):127–132

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ghanoon SA, Tanzadeh J, Mirsepahi M (2020) Laboratory evaluation of the composition of nano-clay, nano-lime and SBS modifiers on rutting resistance of asphalt binder. Constr Build Mater 238:117592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feng C, Zhang H, Li C, Jia W, Lai F (2019) The effects of hollow glass microsphere modification on the road performances and thermal performance of asphalt binder and mixture. Constr Build Mater 220:64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Du Y, Chen J, Han Z, Liu W (2018) A review on solutions for improving rutting resistance of asphalt pavement and test methods. Constr Build Mater 168:893–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mohajerani A, Bakaric J, Jeffrey-Bailey T (2017) The urban heat island effect, its causes, and mitigation, with reference to the thermal properties of asphalt concrete. J Environ Manag 197:522–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Llopis-Castelló D, García-Segura T, Montalbán-Domingo L, Sanz-Benlloch A, Pellicer E (2020) Influence of pavement structure, traffic, and weather on urban flexible pavement deterioration. Sustainability 12(22):9717. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li Q, Hu T, Luo S, Gao L, Wang C, Guan Y (2020) Evaluation of cooling effect and pavement performance for thermochromic material modified asphalt mixtures under solar radiation. Constr Build Mater 261:120589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Walker CL, Anderson MR (2016) Cloud Impacts on Pavement Temperature and Shortwave Radiation. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 55(11):2329–2347. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0094.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gu X, Liang X, Dong Q (2018) Numerical simulation of long term pavement temperature field. In: Shi X, Liu Z, Liu J (eds) Proceedings of GeoShanghai 2018 International Conference: Transportation Geotechnics and Pavement Engineering. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 400–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0011-0_43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Ariawan IMA, Subagio BS, Setiadji BH (2015) Development of asphalt pavement temperature model for tropical climate conditions in West Bali region. Procedia Engineering 125:474–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Salem HA, Uzelac D, Crvenkovic ZL, Matic B (2014) Development of a model to predict pavement temperature for Brak region in Libya. Appl Mech Mater 638-640:1139–1148. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.638-640.1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gui JG, Phelan PE, Kaloush KE, Golden JS (2007) Impact of pavement thermophysical properties on surface temperatures. J Mater Civ Eng 19(8):683–690. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:8(683)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu L, Wang J, Xiao F, Ei-Badawy S, Awed A (2021) Potential strategies to mitigate the heat island impacts of highway pavement on megacities with considerations of energy uses. Appl Energy 281:116077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Adwan I, Milad A, Memon ZA, Widyatmoko I, Ahmat Zanuri N, Memon NA et al (2021) Asphalt pavement temperature prediction models: a review. Appl Sci 11(9):3794. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun Y, Du C, Gong H, Li Y, Chen J (2020) Effect of temperature field on damage initiation in asphalt pavement: A microstructure-based multiscale finite element method. Mech Mater 144:103367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Barber ES (1957) Calculation of maximum pavement temperatures from weather reports. Highway Research Board. Bulletin http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/hrbbulletin/168/168-001.pdf

  28. Mammeri A, Ulmet L, Petit C, Mokhtari AM (2015) Temperature modelling in pavements: the effect of long- and short-wave radiation. Int J Pavement Eng 16(3):198–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2014.937809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chakchak J, Sabit Cetin N (2021) Investigating the impact of weather parameters selection on the prediction of solar radiation under different genera of cloud cover: A case-study in a subtropical location. Measurement 176:109159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li H, Harvey J, Jones D (2013) Cooling effect of permeable asphalt pavement under dry and wet conditions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2372(1):97–107. https://doi.org/10.3141/2372-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Xie N, Li H, Zhang H, Zhang X, Jia M (2020) Effects of accelerated weathering on the optical characteristics of reflective coatings for cool pavement. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 215:110698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2020.110698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hermansson Å (2000) Simulation model for calculating pavement temperatures including maximum temperature. Transp Res Rec 1699(1):134–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sun L (2006) Qun J (2006) Prediction model on temperature field in asphalt pavement. J Tong Ji Univ (Natural Science) 04:480–483

    Google Scholar 

  34. Qin Y, Hiller JE, Meng D (2019) Linearity between pavement thermophysical properties and surface temperatures. J Mater Civ Eng 31(11):4019262. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Qin Y (2015) A review on the development of cool pavements to mitigate urban heat island effect. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:445–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang Y, Berardi U, Akbari H (2016) Comparing the effects of urban heat island mitigation strategies for Toronto, Canada. Energy and Buildings 114:2–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Aflaki A, Mirnezhad M, Ghaffarianhoseini A, Ghaffarianhoseini A, Omrany H, Wang Z et al (2017) Urban heat island mitigation strategies: A state-of-the-art review on Kuala Lumpur, Singapore and Hong Kong. Cities 62:131–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mascaro JJ (2012) Shaded pavements in the urban environment - a case study. Road Mater Pavement Des 13(3):556–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2012.657098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Santamouris M (2013) Using cool pavements as a mitigation strategy to fight urban heat island—A review of the actual developments. Renew Sust Energ Rev 26:224–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cao X, Tang B, Zou X, He L (2015) Analysis on the cooling effect of a heat-reflective coating for asphalt pavement. Road Mater Pavement Des 16(3):716–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2015.1026383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bretz S, Akbari H, Rosenfeld A (1998) Practical issues for using solar-reflective materials to mitigate urban heat islands. Atmos Environ 32(1):95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00182-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cheng M (2008) Development of colorful heat reflective roof coatings. Dissertation. Beijing Univ Chem Technol

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nishioka M, Nabeshima M, Wakama S, Ueda J (2006) Effects of surface temperature reduction and thermal environment on high albedo coating asphalt pavement. J Heat Island Inst Int 1:46–52

    Google Scholar 

  44. Santamouris M, Gaitani N, Spanou A, Saliari M, Giannopoulou K, Vasilakopoulou K et al (2012) Using cool paving materials to improve microclimate of urban areas – Design realization and results of the flisvos project. Build Environ 53:128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.01.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Synnefa A, Karlessi T, Gaitani N, Santamouris M, Assimakopoulos DN, Papakatsikas C (2011) Experimental testing of cool colored thin layer asphalt and estimation of its potential to improve the urban microclimate. Build Environ 46(1):38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Akbari H, Pomerantz M, Taha H (2001) Cool surfaces and shade trees to reduce energy use and improve air quality in urban areas. Sol Energy 70(3):295–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00089-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Middel A, Turner VK, Schneider FA, Zhang Y, Stiller M (2020) Solar reflective pavements-A policy panacea to heat mitigation? Environ Res Lett 15(6):64016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab87d4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Xie N, Li H, Abdelhady A, Harvey J (2019) Laboratorial investigation on optical and thermal properties of cool pavement nano-coatings for urban heat island mitigation. Build Environ 147:231–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.10.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Xie N, Li H, Zhao W, Zhang C, Yang B, Zhang H et al (2019) Optical and durability performance of near-infrared reflective coatings for cool pavement: Laboratorial investigation. Build Environ 163:106334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Jiang Y, Deng C, Chen Z, Tian Y (2020) Evaluation of the cooling effect and anti-rutting performance of thermally resistant and heat-reflective pavement. Int J Pavement Eng 21(4):447–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1483506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang C, Sun X, Guo T, Gao Z, Wang X (2019) Investigations on cooling effects of prepared pavement coatings using the Grubbs method and linear regression analysis. Road Mater Pavement Des 20(1):171–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2017.1380072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Chen Q, Wang C, Fu H, Zhang L (2018) Durability evaluation of road cooling coating. Constr Build Mater 190:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wang H, Zhong J, Feng D, Meng J, Xie N (2013) Nanoparticles-modified polymer-based solar-reflective coating as a cooling overlay for asphalt pavement. Int J Smart Nano Mater 4(2):102–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475411.2012.714808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hu B, Liang YH, Guo LY, Jiang T (2017) Preparation and performance evaluation of epoxy-based heat reflective coating for the pavement. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 61(1):12083. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/61/1/012083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Yi Y, Jiang Y, Li Q, Deng C, Ji X, Xue J (2019) Development of super road heat-reflective coating and its field application. Coatings 9(12):802. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9120802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Carnielo E, Zinzi M (2013) Optical and thermal characterisation of cool asphalts to mitigate urban temperatures and building cooling demand. Build Environ 60:56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Jiang L, Wang L, Wang S (2019) A novel solar reflective coating with functional gradient multilayer structure for cooling asphalt pavements. Constr Build Mater 210:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Tang B, Ding Y, Cao X, Xie Z (2012) Effects roadway contaminants on cooling performance of heat-reflective asphalt pavement. J Build Mater 15(06):793–797

    Google Scholar 

  59. Xie L, Zhan Q, Hiromitsu N, Cao X, Tian H, Zhang Y (2020) Preparation of grey thermal reflective materials and study on their properties. Electroplating & Finishing 39(22):1573–1577

    Google Scholar 

  60. Wan WC, Hien WN, Ping TP, Aloysius AZW (2012) A study of the effectiveness of heat-mitigating pavement coatings in Singapore. J Heat Island Inst Int 7(2):238–247

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sha A, Liu Z, Tang K, Li P (2017) Solar heating reflective coating layer (SHRCL) to cool the asphalt pavement surface. Constr Build Mater 139:355–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. You Z, Zhang M, Wang J, Pei W (2019) A black near-infrared reflective coating based on nano-technology. Energ Build 205:109523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhang H, Quan W, Liu J, Lai F (2020) Thermosetting powder coating for asphalt pavement. Road Mater Pavement Des 21(1):217–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2018.1484383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Zheng M, Han L, Wang F, Mi H, Li Y, He L (2015) Comparison and analysis on heat reflective coating for asphalt pavement based on cooling effect and anti-skid performance. Constr Build Mater 93:1197–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.04.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Du Y, Dai M, Deng H, Deng D, Wei T, Kong L (2020) Laboratory investigation on thermal and road performances of asphalt mixture containing glass microsphere. Constr Build Mater 264:120710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Du Y, Xu L, Deng H, Deng D, Wu H, Liu W (2020) Evaluation of thermal behavior and high-temperature performances of asphalt mixture containing fly ash cenosphere. Constr Build Mater 245:118429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Pan J, Xing H, Liu G, Wang Y, Liu X (2020) Characterization of thermal properties of bituminous mastic containing different fillers to be used in the cool pavement. Constr Build Mater 265:120362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Khan MI (2002) Factors affecting the thermal properties of concrete and applicability of its prediction models. Build Environ 37(6):607–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(01)00061-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Campbell-Allen D, Thorne CP (1963) The thermal conductivity of concrete. Mag Concr Res 15(43):39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Chen C, Qian C, Xu Y (2012) Calculation model of thermal conductivity of concrete based on minimum thermal resistance theory. J Southeast Univ (Natural Science Edition) 42(02):383–387

    Google Scholar 

  71. Che T, Pan B, Ouyang J (2018) The laboratory evaluation of incorporating ceramsite into HMA as fine aggregates. Constr Build Mater 186:1239–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Anting N, Din MFM, Iwao K, Ponraj M, Siang AJLM, Yong LY et al (2018) Optimizing of near infrared region reflectance of mix-waste tile aggregate as coating material for cool pavement with surface temperature measurement. Energ Build 158:172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Gao L, Wang Z, Xie J, Liu Y, Jia S (2019) Simulation of the cooling effect of porous asphalt pavement with different air voids. Appl Sci 9(18):3659. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9183659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Du Y, Liu P, Wang J, Dan H, Wu H, Li Y (2020) Effect of lightweight aggregate gradation on latent heat storage capacity of asphalt mixture for cooling asphalt pavement. Constr Build Mater 250:118849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Wang J, Zhang Z, Guo D, Xu C, Zhang K, Haider SW (2018) Study on cooling effect and pavement performance of thermal-resistant asphalt mixture. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2018:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6107656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Chen X, Tao H, Lv Z (2017) Research on the performances of thermal resistance asphalt mixture containing calcined bauxite. DEStech Transact Eng Tech Res:106–112

  77. Huang Q, Qian Z, Hu J, Zheng D (2020) Evaluation of stone mastic asphalt containing ceramic waste aggregate for cooling asphalt pavement. Materials 13(13):2964. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13132964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Tang F, Ma T, Zhang J, Guan Y, Chen L (2020) Integrating three-dimensional road design and pavement structure analysis based on BIM. Autom Constr 113:103152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Cammarata JE, Hariharan N, Allen DH, Little DN (2020) A study of moisture-induced cracking during a short-term rain event in a pre-cracked asphalt concrete pavement with an expansive base layer. Int J Pavement Eng 21(10):1180–1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1527333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Jiang Y, Ye Y, Xue J, Chen Z (2018) Thermal resistant stone mastic asphalt surface and its antirutting performance. J Mater Civ Eng 30(11):6018019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Zhang Z, Han J, Nan X, Chen Z, Li S, Jiang Y (2016) Study on composition and cooling technology of heat resistant asphalt pavement. Constrution Tech App 33(06):75–78

    Google Scholar 

  82. Deng H, Deng D, Du Y, Lu X, Yan L (2019) Using lightweight materials to enhance thermal resistance of asphalt mixture for cooling asphalt pavement. Adv Civil Eng 2019:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5216827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Gao Z, Liu L, Xiao X, Wang C, Mu K (2020) Research progress of thermal resistance asphalt mixture. J Chang'an Univ (Natural Sci Ed) 40(01):125–134

    Google Scholar 

  84. Muniandy R, Ismail DH, Hassim S (2018) Performance of recycled ceramic waste as aggregates in hot mix asphalt (HMA). J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20(2):844–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0645-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Wang C, Fu Y, Liu L, Li T (2020) Surface treatment optimization of thermal-resistant aggregate for pavement. J Mater Civ Eng 32(2):4019361. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Wang C, Fu H, Fan Z, Li T (2019) Utilization and properties of road thermal resistance aggregates into asphalt mixture. Constr Build Mater 208:87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Qian Z, Meng F, Yang L (2015) Road performance and thermal insulation performance of asphalt mixture containing ceramic waste. J Highway Transport Res Develop 32(05):19–24

    Google Scholar 

  88. Andrzejuk W, Barnat-Hunek D, Siddique R, Zegardło B, Bagód G (2018) Application of recycled ceramic aggregates for the production of mineral-asphalt mixtures. Materials 11(5):658. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11050658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Liu Y, Li T, Yu L (2020) Urban heat island mitigation and hydrology performance of innovative permeable pavement: A pilot-scale study. J Clean Prod 244:118938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Jiang W, Sha A, Xiao J, Wang Z, Apeagyei A (2016) Experimental study on materials composition design and mixture performance of water-retentive asphalt concrete. Constr Build Mater 111:128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Wang C, Wang Z, Kaloush KE, Shacat J (2021) Cool pavements for urban heat island mitigation: A synthetic review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 146:111171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Takebayashi H, Moriyama M (2012) Study on surface heat budget of various pavements for urban heat island mitigation. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2012:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/523051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Nakayama T, Fujita T (2010) Cooling effect of water-holding pavements made of new materials on water and heat budgets in urban areas. Landsc Urban Plan 96(2):57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Shimazaki Y, Aoki M, Nitta J, Okajima H, Yoshida A (2021) Experimental determination of pedestrian thermal comfort on water-retaining pavement for UHI adaptation strategy. Atmosphere 12(2):127. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Dong Q, Wang C, Xiong C, Li X, Wang H, Ling T (2019) Investigation on the cooling and evaporation behavior of semi-flexible water retaining pavement based on laboratory test and thermal-mass coupling analysis. Materials 12(16):2546. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12162546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Wang J, Meng Q, Tan K, Zhang L, Zhang Y (2018) Experimental investigation on the influence of evaporative cooling of permeable pavements on outdoor thermal environment. Build Environ 140:184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.05.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Buyung NR, Ghani ANA, Aziz HA, Bakar BHA, Johari MAM, Keong CK et al (2017) Permeable pavements and its contribution to cooling effect of surrounding temperature. In: The International Conference of Global Network for Innovative Technology and AWAM International Conference in Civil Engineering (IGNITE-AICCE'17), Penang

  98. Li H, Harvey J, Ge Z (2014) Experimental investigation on evaporation rate for enhancing evaporative cooling effect of permeable pavement materials. Constr Build Mater 65:367–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Hendel M, Colombert M, Diab Y, Royon L (2015) Measurement of the cooling efficiency of pavement-watering as an urban heat island mitigation technique. J Sust Develop Energ, Water Environ Syst 3(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.2015.03.0001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Hendel M, Colombert M, Diab Y, Royon L (2015) An analysis of pavement heat flux to optimize the water efficiency of a pavement-watering method. App Therm Eng 78:658–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.11.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Jiang W, Sha A, Pei J, Wang Z (2012) Thermophysical properties and thermal resistance function of permeable asphalt concrete. J Funct Mater 43(03):379–382

    Google Scholar 

  102. Li H, Harvey JT, Holland TJ, Kayhanian M (2013) The use of reflective and permeable pavements as a potential practice for heat island mitigation and stormwater management. Environ Res Lett 8(1):15023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Pyun HB, Kim RH, Lee SH, Park JB (2010) Study on thermal environmental characteristics of water-retentive asphalt pavement. Mater Sci Forum 658:264–267. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.658.264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Chen W, Lou S, Akio M (2011) Indoor experiments on surface evaporation cooling effect of water retention pavement material. Build Sci 27(06):56–60

    Google Scholar 

  105. Chen J, Chu R, Wang H, Zhang L, Chen X, Du Y (2019) Alleviating urban heat island effect using high-conductivity permeable concrete pavement. J Clean Prod 237:117722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Cheng Y, Lo S, Ho C, Lin J, Yu S (2019) Field testing of porous pavement performance on runoff and temperature control in Taipei city. Water 11(12):2635. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11122635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Geng J, Chen M, Shang T, Li X, Kim YR, Kuang D (2019) The performance of super absorbent polymer (SAP) water-retaining asphalt mixture. Materials 12(12):1964. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12121964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Lee SH, Pyun HB, Gee CS, Park JB (2009) Development of environmental-friendly water-retentive asphalt and its characteristics. Mater Sci Forum 620-622:201–204. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.620-622.201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Pan P, Wu S, Xiao Y, Liu G (2015) A review on hydronic asphalt pavement for energy harvesting and snow melting. Renew Sust Energ Rev 48:624–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Wei K, Ma B, Huang X, Xiao Y, Liu H (2019) Influence of NiTi alloy phase change heat-storage particles on thermophysical parameters, phase change heat-storage thermoregulation effect, and pavement performance of asphalt mixture. Renew Energy 141:431–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Jiang W, Xiao J, Yuan D, Lu H, Xu S, Huang Y (2018) Design and experiment of thermoelectric asphalt pavements with power-generation and temperature-reduction functions. Energ Build 169:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.03.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Shaopeng W, Mingyu C, Jizhe Z (2011) Laboratory investigation into thermal response of asphalt pavements as solar collector by application of small-scale slabs. Applied Therm Eng 31(10):1582–1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.01.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Chen Y, Wang H, You Z, Hossiney N (2020) Application of phase change material in asphalt mixture – A review. Constr Build Mater 263(120219):120219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Pielichowska K, Pielichowski K (2014) Phase change materials for thermal energy storage. Prog Mater Sci 65:67–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Tahami SA, Gholikhani M, Nasouri R, Dessouky S, Papagiannakis AT (2019) Developing a new thermoelectric approach for energy harvesting from asphalt pavements. Appl Energy 238:786–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Zwarycz K (2002) Snow melting and heating systems based on geothermal heat pumps at Goleniow Airport. United Nations University, Iceland, Poland

    Google Scholar 

  117. Wendel IL (1979) Paving and solar energy system and method. US Patent 4,132,074 (2 Jan 1979)

  118. Tanaka O, Yamakage H, Ogushi T, Murakami M, Tanaka Y (1982) Snow melting using heat pipes. In: Reay DA (ed) Advances in Heat Pipe Technology. Pergamon

    Google Scholar 

  119. Tan Y, Zhang C, Xu H, Tian D (2019) Snow melting and deicing characteristics and pavement performance of active deicing and snow melting pavement. China J Highway Trans 32(04):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  120. Bobes-Jesus V, Pascual-Muñoz P, Castro-Fresno D, Rodriguez-Hernandez J (2013) Asphalt solar collectors: A literature review. Appl Energy 102:962–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.08.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Loomans M, Oversloot H, De Bondt A, Jansen R, Van Rij H. (2003). Design tool for the thermal energy potential of asphalt pavements. In: Eighth International IBPSA Conference, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2003-08-11

  122. Eugster WJ, Schatzmann J. (2002). Harnessing solar energy for winter road clearing on heavily loaded expressways. In: Proceedings of XIth PIARC International Winter Road Congress, Sapporo, Japan, 2002-01-28

  123. Sharma A, Tyagi VV, Chen CR, Buddhi D (2009) Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials and applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13(2):318–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Liu T, Gun N, Tan Y, You Z, Jin X (2020) Research and development trend of road usage phase change materials. Mater Rep 34(23):23179–23189

    Google Scholar 

  125. Tyagi VV, Buddhi D (2007) PCM thermal storage in buildings: A state of art. Renew Sust Energ Rev 11(6):1146–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Athukorallage B, Dissanayaka T, Senadheera S, James D (2018) Performance analysis of incorporating phase change materials in asphalt concrete pavements. Constr Build Mater 164:419–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Wei K, Wang X, Ma B, Shi W, Duan S, Liu F (2019) Study on rheological properties and phase-change temperature control of asphalt modified by polyurethane solid–solid phase change material. Sol Energy 194:893–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Bian X, Tan Y, Lv J, Shan L (2012) Preparation of latent heat materials used in asphalt pavement and theirs’ controlling temperature performance. Advanced Eng Forum 5:322–327. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.5.322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Jin J, Liu S, Gao Y, Liu R, Huang W, Wang L et al (2021) Fabrication of cooling asphalt pavement by novel material and its thermodynamics model. Constr Build Mater 272:121930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Kuai C, Chen J, Shi X, Grasley Z (2021) Regulating porous asphalt concrete temperature using PEG/SiO2 phase change composite: Experiment and simulation. Constr Build Mater 273:122043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Jin J, Liu L, Liu R, Wei H, Qian G, Zheng J et al (2019) Preparation and thermal performance of binary fatty acid with diatomite as form-stable composite phase change material for cooling asphalt pavements. Constr Build Mater 226:616–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Jin J, Xiao T, Zheng J, Liu R, Qian G, Xie J et al (2018) Preparation and thermal properties of encapsulated ceramsite-supported phase change materials used in asphalt pavements. Constr Build Mater 190:235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Ma B, Li J, Liu RW, Ma J (2011) Study on road performance of phase-change temperature-adjusting asphalt mixture. Adv Mater Res 287-290:978–981. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.287-290.978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Cocu X, Nicaise D, Rachidi S (2010) The use of phase change materials to delay pavement freezing. Proceedings of XIII In- ternational Winter Road Congress, Quebec, Canada, In

    Google Scholar 

  135. Liu Z, Wang Y, Jia J, Sun H, Wang H, Qiao H (2020) Preparation and characterization of temperature-adjusting asphalt with diatomite-supported PEG as an additive. J Mater Civ Eng 32(3):4020019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Bian X (2013) Preparation of phase change asphalt mixture and its controling temperature mechanism. Dissertation. Harbin Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  137. Zhu S, Ji T, Niu D, Yang Z (2020) Investigation of PEG/mixed metal oxides as a new form-stable phase change material for thermoregulation and improved UV ageing resistance of bitumen. RSC Adv 10(73):44903–44911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Chen M, Hong J, Wu S, Lu W, Xu G (2011) Optimization of phase change materials used in asphalt pavement to prevent rutting. Adv Mater Res 219-220:1375–1378. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.219-220.1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Ma B, Si W, Ren J, Wang H, Liu F, Li J (2014) Exploration of road temperature-adjustment material in asphalt mixture. Road Mate Pavement Des 15(3):659–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2014.885462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Wei K, Ma B, Wang H, Liu Y, Luo Y (2017) Synthesis and thermal properties of novel microencapsulated phase-change materials with binary cores and epoxy polymer shells. Polym Bull 74(2):359–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-016-1718-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Guo Y, Yang W, Jiang Z, He F, Zhang K, He R et al (2019) Silicone rubber/paraffin@silicon dioxide form-stable phase change materials with thermal energy storage and enhanced mechanical property. Solar Energ Mater Solar Cells 196:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.03.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Zhang L, Yang W, Jiang Z, He F, Zhang K, Fan J et al (2017) Graphene oxide-modified microencapsulated phase change materials with high encapsulation capacity and enhanced leakage-prevention performance. Appl Energy 197:354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Liu C, Chen P, Li K (2014) A 1 KW thermoelectric generator for low-temperature geothermal resources. In: Thirty-Ninth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, California 2014-02-24

  144. Lau PG, Buist RJ (1997, 1997) Calculation of thermoelectric power generation performance using finite element analysis. In

  145. Hu F, Zhu S, Wang A, Xiong S (2014) Design analysis and experimentals study of asphalt pavement temperature difference power generation system. J Wuhan Univ Tech (Transportation Science & Engineering) 38(04):834–838

    Google Scholar 

  146. Mallick RB, Chen B, Bhowmick S (2009) Harvesting energy from asphalt pavements and reducing the heat island effect. Int J Sustain Eng 2(3):214–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397030903121950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Wu S, Mo L, Shui Z, Chen Z (2005) Investigation of the conductivity of asphalt concrete containing conductive fillers. Carbon 43(7):1358–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2004.12.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Hasebe M, Kamikawa Y, Meiarashi S. (2006). Thermoelectric generators using solar thermal energy in heated road pavement. In: International Conference on Thermoelectrics, 2006-08-06

  149. Montero FJ, Lamba R, Ortega A, Jahn W, Guzmán AM (2021) A novel 24-h day-night operational solar thermoelectric generator using phase change materials. J Clean Prod 296:126553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Kraemer D, Jie Q, Mcenaney K, Cao F, Liu W, Weinstein LA et al (2016) Concentrating solar thermoelectric generators with a peak efficiency of 7.4%. Nature. Energy 1(11). https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.153

  151. Karlessi T, Santamouris M, Synnefa A, Assimakopoulos D, Didaskalopoulos P, Apostolakis K (2011) Development and testing of PCM doped cool colored coatings to mitigate urban heat island and cool buildings. Build Environ 46(3):570–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant Number: 2019YFE0117600).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZG, LZ, JW and ZX collected and synthesized references. ZG created tables and figures to present the data, and drafted and wrote the manuscript. YM initiated the project and conceptualization, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. LW reviewed and revised the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yinghao Miao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gong, Z., Zhang, L., Wu, J. et al. Review of regulation techniques of asphalt pavement high temperature for climate change adaptation. J Infrastruct Preserv Resil 3, 9 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43065-022-00054-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43065-022-00054-5

Keywords