Skip to main content

Table 5 Optimal design of HPFRCC mixtures

From: A framework for improving bridge resilience and sustainability through optimizing high-performance fiber-reinforced cementitious composites

Mix design

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5

S6

S7

S8

S9

Design variables

 Cement-to-binder ratio

14.4

25.0

25.0

11.8

16.1

16.1

11.8

24.9

25.0

 Fly ash-to-binder ratio

27.1

28.4

28.4

20.5

30.8

30.8

27.2

27.0

28.4

 Slag-to-binder ratio

7.2

7.2

7.3

7.5

6.8

6.8

6.6

7.4

7.1

 Rice husk-to-binder ratio

5.2

9.5

9.4

6.0

17.2

17.2

5.4

16.9

9.3

 Limestone-to-binder ratio

40.4

7.2

7.2

43.1

9.0

9.0

43.1

1.6

7.2

 Metakaolin-to-binder ratio

4.7

4.9

4.9

9.4

12.5

12.5

3.8

5.1

4.9

 Silica fume-to-binder ratio

1.0

17.0

16.8

0.3

6.7

6.7

0.5

16.3

16.8

 Sand-to-binder ratio

0.8

0.7

0.8

1.3

0.6

0.6

1.4

0.4

1.4

 Water-to-binder ratio

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.1

 Superplasticizer content (%)

2.0

1.9

1.3

2.0

2.6

2.6

1.8

1.9

1.4

 Fiber volume (%)

2.7

2.7

2.8

1.7

2.7

2.7

2.6

2.7

2.7

 Fiber length (mm)

18

12

11

27

12

12

27

12

27

 Fiber diameter (μm)

24

17

17

40

16

16

40

17

40

 Elastic modulus of fibers (GPa)

100

6

6

200

6

6

200

6

200

Fiber type

PEa

PPb

PP

Steel

PP

PP

Steel

PP

Steel

Output variables

 Compressive strength (MPa)

59.1

62.5

67.3

93.1

103.3

103.2

70.9

114.1

102.6

 First crack stress (MPa)

4.8

4.9

5.1

5.6

5.7

5.7

4.9

5.0

5.3

 Ultimate tensile strength (MPa)

16.6

14.0

17.2

9.4

10.0

10.0

14.1

11.6

13.2

 Ultimate tensile strain (%)

6.0

7.1

4.2

8.5

10.0

10.0

6.1

4.2

8.0

 Carbon footprint (kg/m3)

745

1142

1207

895

1943

1990

1010

2249

1485

 Cost (USD/m3)

633

456

458

872

566

579

1143

610

1292

 Sustainability index

0.89

0.87

0.84

0.7

0.54

0.51

0.5

0.41

0.25

  1. aPE stands for polyethylene fiber; bPP stands for polypropylene fiber