Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of the literature review on retroreflectivity degradation modeling

From: Modeling retroreflectivity degradation of pavement markings across the US with advanced machine learning algorithms

Reference

Material(s)

Input(s)

Model(s)

R2

Study Site(s)

Lee et al. [15]

Waterborne paint, thermoplastic, polyester, tape

Time

Simple linear regression

0.14 – 0.18

MI

Abboud and Bowman [16]

Waterborne paint, thermoplastic

Traffic

Exponential regression

0.31 –0.58

AL

Sarasua et al. [19]

Thermoplastic, epoxy

Time

Simple linear regression

0.21 – 0.47

SC

Hollingsworth [17]

Waterborne paint, thermoplastic

Time, traffic, bead type, color, initial retroreflectivity, lateral line location, and time

Logarithmic

0.53

NC

Sitzabee et al. [18]

Thermoplastic, waterborne paint

Time, initial retroreflectivity, traffic, line lateral location, line color

Multiple linear regression

0.60 – 0.75

NC

Karwa and Donnell [25]

Thermoplastic

Initial retroreflectivity, time, traffic, marking type, marking location

Artificial Neural Network (ANN)

-

NC

Robertson et al. [20]

Waterborne paint

Time, traffic, lane width, shoulder width

Multiple linear regression

0.24 – 0.34

SC

Ozelim and Turochy [9]

Thermoplastic

Time, traffic, initial retroreflectivity

Multiple linear regression

0.49

AL

Malyuta [21]

Waterborne paint, thermoplastic

Time, traffic

Multiple linear regression

0.33 – 0.46

TN

Mousa et al. [11]

Waterborne paint

Initial retroreflectivity, manufacturer, surface type, color, thickness, bead types, time, air temperature, rainfall, snowfall, traffic, surface age

Categorical Boosting

0.83 – 0.98

FL, PA, MN, MS

Idris et al. [26]

Thermoplastic

Initial retroreflectivity, surface type, color, thickness, bead types, rainfall, traffic

Genetic Algorithm

0.64 – 0.93

FL