Table 4 Universal ranking and weighing of variables
From: Development of decision-making system measuring the resilience level of highway projects
# | Dimensions | Normalized Cohen's d value | Rank | Score | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | Length of the disrupted roadway | 0.0339 | 16 | 6 | 0.026 |
3 | Length of the link | 0.0649 | 4 | 18 | 0.0779 |
4 | Number of lanes | 0.0523 | 10 | 12 | 0.0519 |
5 | Number of optional routes | 0.0612 | 5 | 17 | 0.0736 |
7 | Presence of a railroad crossing | 0.0525 | 9 | 13 | 0.0563 |
8 | Distance of the link/node from the affected area | 0.0045 | 21 | 1 | 0.0043 |
9 | Remoteness of the project | 0.0449 | 15 | 7 | 0.0303 |
10 | Time to start reconstruction works | 0.0657 | 3 | 19 | 0.0823 |
13 | Ownership of integrated infrastructure assets | 0.0554 | 7 | 15 | 0.0649 |
14 | Frequency of integration of resilience-enhancing activities into maintenance planning | 0.0214 | 20 | 2 | 0.0087 |
15 | Educational platform on resilience for infrastructure | 0.0218 | 19 | 3 | 0.013 |
16 | Company employees' knowledge of resilience | 0.0480 | 13 | 9 | 0.039 |
19 | Frequency of evaluation of resilience in the project | 0.0224 | 18 | 4 | 0.0173 |
21 | Availability of previous disaster data for the roadway | 0.0757 | 2 | 20 | 0.0866 |
22 | Access to previous disaster data for the roadway | 0.0601 | 6 | 16 | 0.0693 |
24 | Availability of emergency response equipment | 0.0552 | 8 | 14 | 0.0606 |
26 | Accessibility to non-machinery resources (human and material) | 0.0281 | 17 | 5 | 0.0216 |
30 | Regular funding for resilience-enhancement activities | 0.0499 | 11 | 11 | 0.0476 |
31 | Time of allocation of funding | 0.0499 | 12 | 10 | 0.0433 |
34 | Resilience investment in new projects | 0.0859 | 1 | 21 | 0.0909 |
35 | Frequency of investing in resilience-enhancing activities | 0.0463 | 14 | 8 | 0.0346 |