Skip to main content

Table 5 Optimal design of HPFRCC mixtures

From: Correction: Optimizing high-performance fiber-reinforced cementitious composites for improving bridge resilience and sustainability

Mix design

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5

S6

S7

S8

S9

Design variables

         

Cement-to-binder ratio

14.4

25.0

25.0

11.8

16.1

16.1

11.8

24.9

25.0

Fly ash-to-binder ratio

27.1

28.4

28.4

20.5

30.8

30.8

27.2

27.0

28.4

Slag-to-binder ratio

7.2

7.2

7.3

7.5

6.8

6.8

6.6

7.4

7.1

Rice husk-to-binder ratio

5.2

9.5

9.4

6.0

17.2

17.2

5.4

16.9

9.3

Limestone-to-binder ratio

40.4

7.2

7.2

43.1

9.0

9.0

43.1

1.6

7.2

Metakaolin-to-binder ratio

4.7

4.9

4.9

9.4

12.5

12.5

3.8

5.1

4.9

Silica fume-to-binder ratio

1.0

17.0

16.8

0.3

6.7

6.7

0.5

16.3

16.8

Sand-to-binder ratio

0.8

0.7

0.8

1.3

0.6

0.6

1.4

0.4

1.4

Water-to-binder ratio

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.1

Superplasticizer content (%)

2.0

1.9

1.3

2.0

2.6

2.6

1.8

1.9

1.4

Fiber volume (%)

2.7

2.7

2.8

1.7

2.7

2.7

2.6

2.7

2.7

Fiber length (mm)

18

12

11

27

12

12

27

12

27

Fiber diameter (μm)

24

17

17

40

16

16

40

17

40

Elastic modulus of fibers (GPa)

100

6

6

200

6

6

200

6

200

Fiber type

PE1

PP2

PP

Steel

PP

PP

Steel

PP

Steel

Output variables

         

Compressive strength (MPa)

59.1

62.5

67.3

93.1

103.3

103.2

70.9

114.1

102.6

First crack stress (MPa)

4.8

4.9

5.1

5.6

5.7

5.7

4.9

5.0

5.3

Ultimate tensile strength (MPa)

16.6

14.0

17.2

9.4

10.0

10.0

14.1

11.6

13.2

Ultimate tensile strain (%)

6.0

7.1

4.2

8.5

10.0

10.0

6.1

4.2

8.0

Carbon footprint (kg/m3)

745

1142

1207

895

1943

1990

1010

2249

1485

Cost (USD/m3)

633

456

458

872

566

579

1143

610

1292

Sustainability index

0.89

0.87

0.84

0.7

0.54

0.51

0.5

0.41

0.25

  1. 1PE stands for polyethylene fiber; 2PP stands for polypropylene fiber