Study aspects | Primary considerations |
---|---|
Research Objectives | • Solving vehicle scheduling problem ([88], [93], [83], [38]) |
 • Assessing the criticality of infrastructure components ([117], [121], [138], [18], [108], [77], [84], [103], [134]) | |
 • Developing post-disaster road restoration model ([136], [6], [90], [44], [95], [47]) | |
 • Estimating reliability using uncertain parameters (e.g., link capacity, people’s | |
 • Analyzing vulnerability of the transportation network ([96], [113], [76], [87], [64], [81], [43], [134]) | |
 • Developing resilience model ([132], [41], [141], [3], [72], [66], [26], [99], [73], [70]) | |
Methodology | • Concept-based discussion ([27], [88], [96], [16], [113], [108], [106]) |
 • Uncertainty or probabilistic analysis-based model development ([118], [18], [15], [31], [32], [46], [19], [119]) | |
 • Deterministic analysis of vulnerability or reliability ([81], [49]) | |
 • Regressing model-based analysis [77] | |
 • Simulation-based analysis of vulnerability or reliability ([138], [43], [103], [14]) | |
 • Disutility function-based analysis [137] | |
 • Sensitivity analysis of network reliability [42] | |
 • Optimization function-based model development ([93], [83], [88], [121], [136], [6], [90], [44], [95], [46]) | |
 • Population-based formulation to measure accessibility [117] | |
 • GIS-based framework development [66] | |
Key findings | • Appropriate modeling tool can reduce computation time, cost or number of variables in solving rescheduling problem in transportation system operation ([88], [93], [83]) |
 • Medium traffic demand condition shows larger drops in speeds compared to high demand case in disaster [121] | |
 • Restoration model determines the optimized restoration time of the road network by planning road trips in a post-disaster scenario ([136], [6]) | |
 • Vulnerability index can be used to explore and detect the criticality/importance of different network components ([76], [87], [18], [108], [81], [43], [77], [84], [31]) | |
 • Based on drivers’ route choice behavior in a post-disaster scenario, the network capacity can be adjusted to accommodate traffic demand at a required level of service [32] | |
 • The impact of the disaster may vary significantly based on the region of the studied network system [132] | |
 • Additional travel time for a trip can be used to measure the disaster impact [41] | |
 • Increased delay due to the disaster can occur in the post-disaster situation due to the congestion on reduced functional links and nodes in a network [141] | |
Application domain | • Roadway transportation ([117], [121], [66], [136], [6], [76], [81], [43], [77], [41], [27], [88], [83], [38], [18], [15], [132]) |
 • Railway transportation ([27], [88], [83], [38], [93], [18], [15], [87], [64]) | |
 • Airway transportation (both passenger and freight) ([138], [108]) | |
Region of the study | • Hypothetical Network ([27], [88], [83], [38], [93], [121]), [136], [118], [32]) |
 • Real-world road network system ([117], [76], [77], [81], [43], [84], [134], [6], [132], [8], [9]) | |
Disaster scenarios | • Natural Disaster ([16], [81], [90], [44], [95], [46], [47], [117], [77], [49], [132], [41]) |
 • Man-made events ([43], [77], [49], [14], [64], [31], [27], [88], [83], [38], [93], [121], [136], [6]) |