Meta-analysis on PET plastic as concrete aggregate using response surface methodology and regression analysis

Chong, Beng Wei; Shi, Xijun

doi:10.1186/s43065-022-00069-y

Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience

Table 2 Literature for PET-FA expression

From: Meta-analysis on PET plastic as concrete aggregate using response surface methodology and regression analysis

Source	No.	PET (%)	Cement (kg/m³)	CA (kg/m³)	FA (kg/m³)	W/C ratio	28-day Compressive Strength (MPa)
Thorneycroft et al., 2018 [41]	1	0	550	780	780	0.4	53.80
	2	10	550	780	780	0.4	54.40
	3	10	550	780	780	0.4	51.80
	4	10	550	780	780	0.4	51.60
Ohemeng et al., 2014 [42]	5	0	414	1241	828	0.3	38.12
	6	10	414	1241	828	0.3	35.23
	7	20	414	1241	828	0.3	31.14
	8	30	414	1241	828	0.3	26.16
	9	40	414	1241	828	0.3	22.52
	10	50	414	1241	828	0.3	17.55
	11	60	414	1241	828	0.3	14.70
	12	0	414	1241	828	0.35	41.66
	13	10	414	1241	828	0.35	37.14
	14	20	414	1241	828	0.35	33.41
	15	30	414	1241	828	0.35	27.86
	16	40	414	1241	828	0.35	24.11
	17	50	414	1241	828	0.35	19.85
	18	60	414	1241	828	0.35	16.10
	19	0	414	1241	828	0.4	44.50
	20	10	414	1241	828	0.4	41.44
	21	20	414	1241	828	0.4	38.76
	22	30	414	1241	828	0.4	29.30
	23	40	414	1241	828	0.4	25.30
	24	50	414	1241	828	0.4	20.83
	25	60	414	1241	828	0.4	17.30
	26	0	414	1241	828	0.45	47.29
	27	10	414	1241	828	0.45	43.58
	28	20	414	1241	828	0.45	39.83
	29	30	414	1241	828	0.45	31.95
	30	40	414	1241	828	0.45	27.18
	31	50	414	1241	828	0.45	21.89
	32	60	414	1241	828	0.45	18.81
Rai et al., 2012 [43]	33	0	432	1282	469	0.44	42.24
	34	5	432	1282	469	0.44	40.08
	35	10	432	1282	469	0.44	39.31
	36	15	432	1282	469	0.44	38.17
Black, 2020 [44]	37	0	450	1080	630	0.5	47.20
	38	10	450	1080	630	0.5	45.40
	39	20	450	1080	630	0.5	47.40
Ferrotto et al., 2022 [45]	40	0	315	798	735	0.5	18.43
	41	10	315	798	735	0.5	12.90
	42	20	315	798	735	0.5	8.60
Albano et al., 2009 [46]	43	0	320	736	1152	0.5	21.29
	44	10	320	736	1152	0.5	18.25
	45	20	320	736	1152	0.5	12.82
	46	0	407	407	1099	0.6	27.90
	47	10	407	407	1099	0.6	22.45
	48	20	407	407	1099	0.6	18.38
Irwan Juki et al., 2013 [47]	49	0	295	1085	885	0.45	31.23
	50	25	295	1085	885	0.45	27.89
	51	50	295	1085	885	0.45	22.94
	52	75	295	1085	885	0.45	17.02
	53	0	295	1085	885	0.55	26.71
	54	25	295	1085	885	0.55	25.52
	55	50	295	1085	885	0.55	20.35
	56	75	295	1085	885	0.55	15.94
	57	0	295	1085	885	0.65	25.42
	58	25	295	1085	885	0.65	25.31
	59	50	295	1085	885	0.65	19.06
	60	75	295	1085	885	0.65	15.62

Back to article page