Table 5 Comparison of axial compressive capacity of corroded specimens using experimental results and theoretical capacity from Eq. (9)
Specimen | Theo. Cap. (kN) | Exp. Cap. (kN) | Cap. Diff. (%) | Mass Loss (%) | Theo. Cap. Drop (%) | Exp. Cap. Drop (%) | Cap. Loss/Energy (%/kwh) | Exp. Crit. Displ. (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BB-R-1 | 2470 | 2981 | −17.1 | 27.2 | 9.9 | 8.4 | 0.90 | 26 |
BB-R-2 | 2557 | 3061 | −16.5 | 18.9 | 6.7 | 6.0 | 0.60 | 37 |
NN-R-1 | 2875 | 3132 | −8.2 | 18.4 | 8.7 | 10.0 | 0.80 | 36 |
NN-R-2 | 2827 | 2732 | 3.5 | 22.6 | 10.3 | 22.3 | 1.5 | 31 |
CN-R-1 | 2760 | 2872 | −3.9 | 21.0 | 7.6 | 12.7 | 0.89 | 39 |
CN-R-2 | 2816 | 3044 | −7.5 | 16.1 | 5.8 | 7.5 | 0.69 | 35 |